Suresh Joshi, PhD, MD, left, and Alexander Fridman, PhD, at the Drexel Plasma Institute in January 2022. Photo courtesy of Suresh Joshi.
In 2022, Drexel University C. & J. Nyheim Plasma Institute (NPI) celebrates 20 years not only as a multidisciplinary research and teaching institute at the University, but as a beacon and international birthplace of plasma medicine. In this branch of plasma biomedical engineering, plasma, the fourth state of matter in which neutral atoms and molecules are somewhat transformed into charged particles like electrons and ions, is used in various ways for medical applications, engineering and environmental sciences, from disease prevention and treatment to regenerative medicine to water disinfection to air cleaning. Plasma medicine is an emerging branch that integrates basic sciences and engineering with biomedical sciences, medicine and public health.
Suresh Joshi, MD, PhD, has been involved with the NPI since 2008 and is the director of the NPI Center for Plasma in Health & Biomedical Engineering. A professor in the School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems and NPI, and assistant professor in the College of Medicine, Joshi has written the following article on the history of the institute and highlights from the past two decades.
The Nyheim Plasma Institute at Drexel University is actually the birthplace of plasma medicine. This year, it celebrates 20 years since its creation at Drexel University. Originally founded in 2002 as the AJ Drexel Plasma Institute (DPI), it has gone through a roller coaster ride like any other traditional academic research institute, but is still doing consistently progressive research and innovation over the of all these years. In 2016, Drexel Plasma Institute was renamed “The C&J Nyheim Plasma Institute” (NPI) in honor of the generous gift of Christel and John Nyheim and their family to DPI and their support as passionate advocates of plasma science and engineering.
Since its inception, NPI’s founding director, Alexander Fridman, PhD, who is the John A. Nyheim Professor at the College of Engineering, and his team of researchers and faculty from all disciplines have successfully curated a portfolio of awesome research. Today, the Plasma Institute at Drexel University is the largest plasma research institution in the United States of America in an academic configuration. More than 25 international, global, and US patents have been generated by research at Drexel University by NPI, and many of Drexel’s patented plasma-based technologies are translated from field trials to commercialization phases. More than 30 Drexel faculty, scientists and staff, as well as numerous alumni, students and associates, have contributed significantly to its growth.
As you can see, the NPI has grown over the years at Drexel and has also expanded the field and capabilities of plasma medicine worldwide. Here are some important points:
In 2003, the idea of plasma medicine at Drexel came to fruition through effective collaborations between faculties, scientists, engineers, and physicians with the then DPI. In 2006, with the help of Drexel University, the Plasma Institute and collaborating departments took a step in a new direction, creating a major research initiative in plasma medicine. This five-year program has helped bring together many renowned faculties, scientists, technologies and physicians (inside and outside of Drexel, as well as international partners).
In 2006–2007, an NPI invention led to the modified floating electrode dielectric barrier discharge (FE-DBD) plasma application technique for healthcare, medicine, and biomedical sciences. The FE-DBD technique is now successfully tested in the field of treatment of wounds, living tissue, skin disinfection and surface sterilization.
From 2008 to 2011, NPI and the Drexel College of Medicine research team led by me and my former colleague Ari Brooks, MD, who was then Associate Professor of Surgery and Chair of the Surgical Oncology Unit at the College of Medicine , have conducted successful research on plasma-treated liquids as potent antimicrobial agents for surface-associated disinfection. During the same period, Jane Azizkhan-Clifford, PhD, who is now Emeritus Professor and Associate Dean for Medical Student Research at the College of Medicine, and her team explored the molecular mechanisms of mammalian cell death and the associated pathways in cellular systems exposed to plasma. During the same period, all of the people mentioned above, and many more, have been instrumental in shifting many research paradigms, including the current Drexel faculties at Drexel Schools and Colleges, as well as external collaborators. They are, I would say, a truly interdisciplinary team of investigators in all pillars of plasma medicine.
In 2009, the International Society of Plasma Medicine (ISPM) was officially launched here with Professor Alexander Fridman as founding president. ISPM meets every two years in different countries and has made substantial progress in the field of plasma medicine. This summer, the 9and International Conference on Plasma Medicine (ICPM9) meets at Jaarbeurs in Utrecht, the Netherlands. These conferences have been instrumental in networking many of the world’s leading plasma scientists, biologists, technologists and healthcare professionals, and have progressed wonderfully through collaborations.
From 2011 to 2014, a team of NPI researchers, led by me, demonstrated for the first time the bacterial biofilm inhibiting properties of plasma-activated solutions. During the same period, our research team demonstrated in vitro how plasma-treated material enhances wound healing in established wound models (in vitro), and subsequently studied rapid pathogen inactivation. multidrug-resistant (MDR) wounds by plasma-alginate dressing. At the 2012 American Society for Microbiology (ASM) International Meeting, my team and I presented research on the plasma-activated alginate dressing that has the ability to not only inactivate multidrug-resistant pathogens, but also to disinfect wounds and promote healing. A year later, my colleagues at Drexel and I explored the exact underlying mechanisms of inactivation, but Bill Costerton, PhD, a renowned microbial ecologist considered “the father of biofilms,” wasn’t there to see. progress; I wish it had been. (During an interview with ASM, he had emphatically mentioned how amazed he was at the invention of the plasma-alginate dressing and wished to see the underlying mechanisms of pathogen inactivation.)
In 2011-2017, Margaret Wheatley, PhD, John M. Reid Professor in the School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Sciences and Systems, and I led a team of researchers to demonstrate a successful application of a solution Non-thermal plasma-activated phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) sterilization. Currently, there is no other technology in the world that can safely sterilize ACU; chemical methods induce some changes in the UCA and are therefore not very suitable for this purpose.
From 2012 to 2013, NPI published another breakthrough, this time demonstrating that plasma-treated solutions not only inactivate biofilm-embedded microbes/pathogens and behave as broad-spectrum microbicides, but also retain their antimicrobial properties for longer. two years at room temperature. This discovery has changed the dynamics of approaches to how plasma-activated solutions can be generated, applied, and stored on the self. Thus, a potentially competent biocidal agent was found comparable to some of the traditional biocides.
In 2014-2017, an NPI team led by Vandana Millar, MD, associate professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the College of Medicine; Fred Krebs, PhD, associate professor in the College of Medicine’s Department of Microbiology and Immunology; and Prof. Alexander Fridman demonstrated how non-thermal plasma exposure leads to immune cell activation and investigated the underlying mechanisms. In 2016, our NPI team demonstrated how plasma-charged non-thermal aerosols inactivate airborne bacteria within seconds and investigated the underlying mechanisms of airborne pathogen inactivation. . These experiments confirmed how plasma-based technologies could help keep operating rooms and hospital premises safe, as shown by mechanism-based studies. Thus, all these innovations contribute to the understanding of plasma-based technologies and their preventive and therapeutic approaches.
In December 2021, Professor Alexander Fridman and I were named United States Experts in Plasma Non-Thermal Technologies through the International commission in electrical engineering (IEC) in Geneva, Switzerland. This nomination is based on our expertise and contributions in non-thermal plasma technologies (Prof. Alexander Fridman for non-thermal plasma technologies, and myself for the application of plasma technologies in biology and medicine). This appointment was proposed by Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) through the American National Institute of Standards (ANSI) to IEC. the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and IEC are global organizations for international standards and are composed of technical experts and representatives of various national standards organizations of member countries. This honor has become a wonderful opportunity to look back on some of Drexel’s Plasma Institute’s outstanding accomplishments related to plasma medicine.
At Drexel, I will redirect my efforts and review some of the plasma medicine products such as plasma solutions, plasma lotion and plasma ointment, and plan interdisciplinary and collaborative research to bring these studies to the translational research phase and to the interventional trials. This research will also open the doors to plasma cosmetic science.
Drexel and NPI have several plasma-based products in various stages of development for healthcare applications. By reactivating collaborative plasma medicine research on campus and re-establishing an interdisciplinary team of researchers, we can achieve this success. I hope that one day our plasma products will reach the community, health centers and end users.
]]>Organizations around the world took to social media last week to show their support for International Women’s Day. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, for many companies, attaching a concise #IWD2022 or #BreakTheBias hashtag to a carefully curated Instagram post or tweet is the start and end point of their commitment to women.
In the United States and elsewhere, the gender pay gap persists. Today, March 15, is Equal Pay Day in the United States – so chosen, according to the National Committee on Pay Equity, because “this date symbolizes how far into the year women must work to earn what the men earned the year before”. Data from the Pew Research Center reveals that in 2020, women earned 84% of what men earned, and that gap widens even more for some women of color.
A British couple decided to call out organizations that literally don’t put their money where they say it does. Francesca Lawson, a writer and social media manager in Manchester, England, and her partner Ali Fensome, a software consultant, have created a Twitter bot, @PayGapAppthat retweets posts from businesses, schools, and nonprofits with specific International Women’s Day keywords or hashtags, along with a rating revealing women’s pay vs. people within the organization.
Unlike US companies, those in Britain with 250 or more employees have been required to publish information on gender pay differences every year since 2018. The large amount of data, publicly available on a website government searchable, reveals that men who work women full-time in the country earned 7.9% more than women in April 2021.
Naturally, Twitter users and retweeted organizations had a lot to say about the Gender Pay Gap Bot revelations (or at least those who didn’t delete the tweets calling them out did).
Related: How you can close the pay gap on #EqualPayDay
Message after message from Gender Pay Gap Bot demonstrates the stark disparity between women’s and men’s salaries. At leading management consulting firm McKinsey & Company, women’s hourly wages are 22.3% lower than men’s. The statistic appears above the company’s retweeted post, which reads “Meet Francesca, ‘I believe no mountain is too high to climb!'” and includes a video of a woman stepping on a rocky terrain.
Twitter users didn’t hold back.
“Keep climbing Francesca.. to another company,” one user wrote. Another joked: “Watch your head at the top – there is a glass ceiling up there! Yet another commented: “It’s not like they tell other companies how they should be run or anything. That’s probably fine.” Inevitably, one user tried to claim that the gender pay gap was a myth propagated by different lifestyle choices, but another user was quick to set the record straight: “You can very easily search ‘gender pay gap’ on Google Scholar and find out how it’s actually not a myth.”
In this organization, the median hourly wage of women is 22.3% lower than that of men. https://t.co/TsZvQFJhZd
– Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 14, 2022
Additionally, the message from lingerie company Boux Avenue, which includes an image of a lacy purple bra and reads: “Anyone obsessed with wearing purple atm? The official color of International Health Month We’ve got the perfect set for YOU! Say hello to Mackenna: super cute, comfy and totally seasonal, what’s not to love?”, received particularly pointed remarks when the bot revealed that the organization pays women a 31.4% lower median hourly wage than men.
“I am obsessed with equality and I pay women what they are worth”, commented a user. Another wrote: “Funny how International Women’s Day has become a marketing opportunity for companies that exploit women. “What’s not to like is that you underpay women,” someone else added.
In this organization, the median hourly wage of women is 31.4% lower than that of men. https://t.co/OyHcEx8XrO
– Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 12, 2022
Some organisations, like Save the Children UK, where women’s median hourly earnings are 5% lower than men’s, have opted to block the bot’s account, but that hasn’t stopped the comments from pouring in. “Deleted for 5%? one user wrote. “It’s a very bad look.” Another added: “They didn’t delete but blocked the bot’s account, which makes the tweet disappear from the quote tweets created by the blocked account. If you go to their page, it’s still there. To my humble opinion, it’s even worse.”
Related: Why leadership is central to closing the gender pay gap
On the other side of the coin, some organizations have used the bot retweet as an opportunity to express their commitment to do better. The bot retweeted financial institution GoCardless’ #IWD post highlighting the company’s director of security and privacy risk, noting that women’s median hourly earnings are 19.9% lower than men’s in the organization.
One user wrote: “Oh wow so many ways@GoCardless could do better by highlighting their 19.9% #GenderPayGap. If the statistic is correct, the feedback is truly a gift, and the action on #EquityPayelle #Equal pay #PayParity would be even better to #BreaktheBias. GoCardless responded to the user, admitting, “We need to close this pay gap. We are making progress and our average and median pay gaps show a downward trend since 2019 with a sharply declining median pay gap. We have also increased the proportion of women in our leadership population from 16% to 28% since 2019.”
In this organization, the median hourly wage of women is 19.9% lower than that of men. https://t.co/aM9rSQQcjH
– Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 13, 2022
Similarly, when it was revealed that women’s hourly wages were 3.9% lower than men’s at English Heritage, a charity that runs historic sites like Stonehenge, the organization was quick to express support for transparency. “This is based on April 2020 data,” the English Heritage account wrote. “Since then, we have worked hard to close our pay gap and it is narrowing. But no matter how small, a gap is a gap and the charity is committed to closing it. Read more https: //bit.ly/3KsRNPG.”
In this organization, the median hourly wage of women is 3.9% lower than that of men. https://t.co/E8K9xNqi9T
– Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 8, 2022
Related: The Gender Pay Gap Is Driving More Women to Create Their Own Paycheck
A much smaller sample of publications featured organizations that have already prioritized equal pay for women and men. For example, hourly wages for men and women are equal at Richmond and Hillcroft Adult Community College – a rare case reported by users. “Honestly one of the first I’ve seen,” one person wrote. Another commented, “Hooray!!”
In this organization, the median hourly wage of men and women is equal. https://t.co/Sx30sf2RUy
– Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 11, 2022
Although the majority of posts highlight the higher incomes of men, there are a few surprising points. At Nottinghamshire Healthcare, women’s median hourly earnings are 6.5% higher than men’s, prompting a flurry of enthusiastic responses from Twitter users: “finally a win for women”, “Hey Well, that’s good news. I’ve been waiting for this one!” and “Finally. Is this the only one. Well done Notts Healthcare.”
In this organization, the median hourly wage of women is 6.4% higher than that of men. https://t.co/XMQdUVzoOo
– Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 9, 2022
Similarly, at Marylebone Cricket Club, women’s median hourly wages are 15.5% higher than men’s, prompting positive comments such as “It surprised me given their historical sexism, misogyny, etc. and the most skeptical: “It’s a women’s cricket club.” again for that.”
In this organization, the median hourly wage of women is 15.5% higher than that of men. https://t.co/JaIyIfG5Ed
– Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 9, 2022
Finally, at Barnet Council, the median hourly wage for women is 25.5% higher than for men. “I’ll be honest, it wasn’t something I expected,” one user wrote. “Shit yeah! said another.
]]>In this organization, the median hourly wage of women is 25.5% higher than that of men. https://t.co/HTwlrBRTrK
– Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 9, 2022
Saint Mary’s Division for Inclusion and Equity hosted a panel via Zoom on Monday to discuss some of the key principles of the controversial critical race theory. The panelists were Saint Mary’s teachers Stacy Davis, Dan Horan and Kelly Faust.
The professors set out to clearly define critical race theory and settle the disagreement surrounding the subject. Each panelist detailed a tenet of critical race theory and argued that the ideas are important to understanding race relations in the United States.
Davis, an associate professor of religious studies and gender and women’s studies, first spoke about the idea of racism as a permanent reality in America.
“Advocating for the permanence of racism is arguing the opposite of a phrase we constantly hear whenever something bad happens, and that’s ‘it’s not who we are,'” said Davis.
Davis pointed to historic treatments of non-whites in America. She said stealing land and excluding Native Americans, Asian Americans and Latinos reinforces that racism “is exactly what we are.”
Although the Fourteenth Amendment granted citizenship to black Americans, “we’re still waiting for that amendment,” she said.
Police brutality, educational inequities and many other hardships facing black Americans are examples of how they are not treated as full citizens, she explained.
Critical race theory plays an important role in acknowledging the realities of American history, Davis said.
“It means we can stop feeling like we’re in the spotlight because every time someone says, ‘that’s not who we are.’ People who are black and brown can come up with a long list of reasons why that’s exactly who we are,” she said.
Horan, a professor of religious studies, theology, and philosophy, described the tenet of critical race theory that the social construction of “whiteness” as property in America has far-reaching legal and social consequences.
Horan explored historical examples of the use of whiteness as a means to gain rights and privileges in the United States. He concluded by comparing his experiences as a white man to the case of Ahmaud Arbery, who in 2020 was shot and killed while running along a road in Brunswick. , Georgia.
“This notion of whiteness as an inalienable, non-transferable property is something that identifies with me,” Horan said. “I carry with me everywhere that I am not exposed to the same threat of danger or discrimination, violence or subjugation as others by virtue of this property of whiteness.”
Faust explained how critical race theory argues that progress and reform in addressing racial inequality in the United States occurs exclusively when white Americans also see a benefit in reform.
“Convergence of interests is essentially where black interests with respect to racial equality will only be considered when they converge with white interests,” Faust said.
Using progress in desegregation as an example, Faust said desegregation was aligned with white interests through its benefits to his international reputation.
“Desegregation allowed the United States to increase our prestige and credibility amid the struggle against communism,” she said.
Increases in support for the Black Lives Matter movement by white people following the death of George Floyd in 2020 could also be seen as an example of a convergence of interests, Faust said.
“It was a point where it finally became popular or at least socially acceptable to embrace Black Lives Matter,” she said.
Discussing the current controversial status of the concept, including a speech on Saturday in which former President Donald Trump called on his supporters to “give their lives” in the fight against critical race theory, the professors expressed their frustration with the common misunderstandings of the concept.
“I was teaching critical race theory for a long time before this happened,” Faust said. “And now, all of a sudden, I have students who are more resistant to it than before. It’s really unfortunate.”
Davis said the discomfort critical race theory can cause by exposing the realities of racism in the United States — despite occasional advances on race issues — is significant.
“The reason I don’t like to use that kind of ‘less’ language is because it suggests you don’t have to keep hustling, and you still have to keep hustling,” Davis said. , referring to the idea that the United States has become “less racist”.
]]>
Editor’s Note: This article was written by Haley Seymour, editor of the Champlain College Crossover and member of the Underground Workshop, VTDigger’s collaborative network of student journalists from across Vermont. For more information, please email Ben Heintz, the workshop editor, at [email protected]
On December 9, 2021, Alejandro “Alex” Hernandez took to the stage in Champlain Hall at Champlain College, introducing himself to students, faculty, staff and stakeholders. Although there were some headphone issues, prompting the switch to handheld microphones midway through the discussion, Hernandez engaged the audience with his story, showing how his experiences make him uniquely positioned to become Champlain’s tenth president. .
Hernandez’s mother was born in the Philippines during World War II under Japanese occupation. When she was growing up, there weren’t many career options for women. She started working in offices, before becoming a teacher. As Hernandez shared his story, he held back tears, apologizing for getting emotional.
Hernandez’s father’s family moved to the United States from Mexico. He began his college education in California, but withdrew before graduating.
Soon after, an educator from his father’s community invited him to participate in the National Teacher Corps, helping people become teachers in underserved areas.
Her father went back to college, graduated, and started working in public primary education. From there, he became interested in high school education and spent most of his working life as a high school guidance counselor, helping others further their education and careers.
“On both sides of my family, there is [were] always educators and mentors along the way that we have been blessed with to help us on our journey,” Hernandez said, and these people have inspired him to become that educator in the lives of others.
Hernandez’s family experiences informed much of his approach to education.
“There’s a lot of talent everywhere,” he said. “It was at my parents’ house, although not everyone saw it.”
Hernandez comes to Champlain as the fourth president in five years, at a time when Champlain is struggling with his sense of direction.
Administrative changes have been widespread in schools across the country, dating back to before the pandemic. At Champlain, turnover has been present in various staff and faculty positions. In November 2020, seven out of nine employees of the Office of International Education left their posts.
Crossing staff sent out a survey to students regarding their opinions on the presidential roll.
Some answers:
Madison Chute Film Major (’22):
“I think turnover is difficult for students in general because there are a lot of rules and regulations that seem to be constantly changing. I think it would have been better to have a stable leader to help the Champlain community through this pandemic. »
Professional Writing Major Sam Wilhoit (’22):
“There has been a lack of identity and authority over who the college is and what it stands for and against.”
Ava Ferguson Major Design Lab Degree (’23):
“The turnover of presidents at Champlain makes me wonder why our school seems like such a temporary destination for highly skilled professionals who have seized the opportunity to lead here. Is there anything going on behind the scenes that can be considered unethical or unsatisfactory? »
Film Major Kol Spielvogel (’23):
“I’m not even entirely sure what a college president actually does other than making speeches and sending emails every time a news event happens, which tends to express the exact same views and opinions as the university email itself.”
Champlain College has had only 10 presidents since its inception in 1878, but recent years have seen half of them.
Donald Laackman stepped down in 2019, prompting Laurie Quinn to take over as interim president.
Benjamin Ola Akande left college in April 2020 to take up a job at Stifel in Saint-Louis.
Akande’s departure created space for interim chairman David Finney to take over, who was already assisting Akande as a consultant.
Judy O’Connell has served as Chair of Champlain’s Board of Directors since October 2021 and has served on the Board for over 10 years. She attributes some of the recent challenges to Covid-19. “You add the turnover of the executive, it’s frankly exhausting,” she said.
O’Connell and the Champlain community hope Hernandez is here to stay.
In an interview with The Crossover, Hernandez shared her own life. Like his parents, Hernandez’s personal experiences inspired his passion and philosophy for education.
Hernandez was born and raised in Stockton, CA, pursuing his undergraduate degree at Claremont McKenna College in Claremont, CA. He earned his MBA and a Masters in Education from Stanford University.
Hernandez applied and interviewed for dozens of jobs during his senior year of college. He didn’t know anyone in business growing up, so learning to navigate professional spaces and understanding cultural norms for interviews were new concepts to him.
“I just remember how difficult that period was for me,” Hernandez explained in a January interview. “Funny enough, it was the hardest time I’ve ever had to find a job.”
“I remember feeling alone figuring out how to take the next step in life,” he said.
He received a job offer in the final days of campus recruiting. His teaching career began when he took a job as a high school math teacher in South Los Angeles.
At Champlain, he said he hopes to focus on a future-oriented education, allowing students to learn major-specific content, but also teaching them how to move forward after college. This is prevalent in the college’s 2030 strategic plan, as well as creating innovative new academic programs and making the college more accessible to diverse groups.
He stressed that his goal is to stay at Champlain for the long term, helping students “jumpstart their lives.” He is particularly interested in Champlain’s innovative programs, its entrepreneurial spirit and its privileged relationship with the State of Vermont.
Hernandez said he will make monthly visits to Champlain by June, engaging with students, faculty and staff to build relationships and learn more about the institution.
“It’s not a stepping stone for me, it’s an opportunity to work on issues that I’ve worked on all my life,” he said.
Hernandez loves poetry and quoted a line from “The Summer Day” by Mary Oliver.
“This is how I want to spend my ‘only wild and precious life’, working on these issues,” he said. “I’m really excited to have this opportunity.”
If you want to keep tabs on Vermont education news, sign up here to receive a weekly email with all of VTDigger’s reports on higher education, early childhood programs, and school policy. K-12 education.
]]>
Sometimes you may need a decent amount of money, and you may not have it on you, so what do you do if you are stuck in a situation like this?
MoneyMutual is an online lending company that offers payday loans. MoneyMutual lets you borrow loans from $200 to $5,000; the best part is that they approve the loans in less than 24 hours. All you have to do is fill in the form provided to you, and you will see a list of lenders from whom you can borrow the required amount.
But the main question running through your head is, “Is MoneyMutual a legit company?” and we’re here to answer that question so you can reassure yourself.
MoneyMutual is an online payday loan provider from which you can borrow money ranging from $200 to $5000. They are also known for their fast service. For example, if you apply for a payday loan today, your loan will be approved and deposited into your account within 24 hours.
To see lenders who can offer you the amount you need, you must first complete a form at MoneyMutual official website. Once you complete the form, you will see lenders in your area that you can borrow money from.
When it comes to trust and transparency, MoneyMutual is one of the most trusted payday loan providers. One of the main reasons for their success is that they maintain transparency between the parties involved.
Over time, MoneyMutual has served over 2,000,000 customers; moreover, they are used to helping customers in any way they can. This payday loan website has come a long way in the last ten years. Several TV stars like Montel Williams are spokespersons for MoneyMutual and have been talking about their competence for a long time.
Getting loans has never been easier, especially if you need a payday loan. MoneyMutual has made it super simple and easy to get payday loans, even if you have bad credit.
But like any lending company, certain eligibility factors come into play. Mentioned below are some necessary things if you want to get a payday loan:
Once you have prepared the prerequisites, go to their website “MoneyMutual.com”, fill in the required information, and that’s it. After that, you will see a list of payday lenders in your area from whom you can borrow the required amount.
MoneyMutual has partnership links with more than 90 companies to make things more convenient.
Once you have chosen the lender you wish to borrow money from, be sure to visit the lender’s website and complete all remaining forms, and only after that will the funds be transferred. on your account.
Simply put, here are the steps you need to take to get a loan successfully:
The answer is no; MoneyMutual won’t charge you a penny for using their site. You can fill in the information free of charge.
But after choosing a lender through this site, the lender will charge you a certain percentage or amount for lending money. So always make sure to read the terms and conditions before taking out a loan.
Moreover, it takes practically no time. You only need 5 minutes to complete the form. On the other hand, if you have used MoneyMutual before, it will take you less than 5 minutes, and once you choose the lender, the loan money is deposited in your account within 24 hours.
As mentioned earlier, MoneyMutual partners with over 90 lenders. This is to ensure that everyone’s needs and requirements are met. Lenders carefully review your information and then make offers to give you the best possible suggestions.
Here is how the verification of information takes place:
All lender associated with MoneyMutual is law abiding. By law, lenders must inform their customers of all fees involved in advance. Lenders aren’t supposed to keep any hidden fees and can’t charge big annual interest.
Before taking out a loan, wherever you are, you should always read the terms and conditions of the loan.
This website makes getting payday loans simple and easy, surprisingly. Moreover, there is no “trap”.
MoneyMutual is transparent about everything they do and connects lenders with people looking for a loan at no cost. But at the same time, before getting a loan, be sure to read the terms and conditions set by the lender.
In an industry where scams are quite common, MoneyMutual is the one that stands out as one of the most trusted payday loan companies. There’s a reason this company has lasted so long and has TV stars as spokespersons; the main reason is that they are reliable.
According to reviews and comments left by customers, MoneyMutual has never disappointed anyone and has always provided short term loans to people when they needed it.
Most people, in general, prefer using MoneyMutual to take out short-term loans because MoneyMutual maintains transparency between lenders and borrowers. On top of that, according to a few other reviews, even MoneyMutual’s customer service is quite exceptional.
Also, all of the negative feedback left was related to unsuccessful interaction with the third-party lender or because the lenders may have tried to charge a high interest rate. None of the negative reviews go to MoneyMutual.
Here are the eligibility conditions to meet if you wish to take out a loan:
As you may have already understood, MoneyMutual is not a lender, but it connects you with several lenders for payday loans. MoneyMutual is based in Las Vegas, Nevada.
here are the MoneyMutual contact details :
According to statistics, nearly 40% of US citizens have problems getting money when needed, and these statistics are taken from the US Household Economic Wellbeing Report.
This can be quite problematic in the long run for many people, which is why MoneyMutual connects people to the best personal loan offers from various lenders, even if you have a bad credit score. You can take out a loan ranging from $200 to $5,000, and it only takes 24 hours to be deposited into your checking account.
If you want to apply or find out more about MoneyMutual, don’t wait. Just go to “MoneyMutual.comyou will find all the answers you need.
RELATED:7 Best Credit Repair Companies and Services to Use in 2022
Affiliate Disclosure:
Links in this product review may result in a small commission if you choose to purchase the recommended product at no additional cost to you. This serves to support our research and writing team. Know that we only recommend high quality products.
Warning:
Please understand that any advice or guidance revealed herein does not even remotely replace sound medical or financial advice from a licensed health care provider or licensed financial advisor. Be sure to consult a professional doctor or financial advisor before making any purchasing decisions if you are using any medications or have any concerns from the review details shared above. Individual results may vary as statements regarding these products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration or Health Canada. The effectiveness of these products has not been confirmed by the FDA or Health Canada approved research. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease or to provide any type of enrichment program.
The news and editorial team at Sound Publishing, Inc. played no role in the preparation of this post. The views and opinions expressed in this sponsored post are those of the advertiser and do not reflect those of Sound Publishing, Inc.
Sound Publishing, Inc. accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage caused by the use of any product, and we do not endorse any product displayed on our Marketplace.
]]>Freshman law student Marcus Montgomery has been selected as the 2022 Squire Patton Boggs Foundation Scholar for Lasting Impact. He was chosen from a large pool of highly qualified law students from across the country.
As a Fellow, Montgomery will have the opportunity to work with the Lone Star Justice Alliance. He will learn how the law is used to establish a justice system that prioritizes developmentally appropriate responses and treats youth and emerging adults with fairness and dignity to promote resilience, reduce costs and increase safety. public.
“We are delighted to welcome Marcus Montgomery to the Foundation’s scholarship program and community,” said Rodney E. Slater JD’80, former United States Secretary of Transportation and President of the Squire Patton Boggs Foundation. “I am very impressed with Marcus’ credentials and his passion for public service. As an alumnus of the University of Arkansas Law School, I am thrilled that Marcus was selected for our scholarship. racial justice focused on juvenile justice in minority communities in Texas. He will be working with a wonderful organization, the Lone Star Justice Alliance, and making a meaningful contribution to its racial justice efforts.”
“I am grateful and thrilled to have the opportunity to participate in this crucial Sustainable Impact Fellowship program, and look forward to gaining hands-on experience with talented lawyers working in the area of public interest law. “, said Montgomery.
Montgomery served as Resident Fellow for Congressional Affairs at the Arab Center in Washington, D.C., from 2019 to 2021, where he liaised with members of Congress, congressional staff, and federal government employees to promote the center in as a political resource. He has participated in interviews with foreign and domestic press and provided commentary on US foreign policy, US domestic policy, and international affairs. Montgomery is also the author of timely analyzes of legislation, executive orders, and other government policies and their impacts on American foreign policy in the Middle East and North Africa.
Montgomery is the Chancellor’s Award Scholar and was the 2021 Arkansas Bar Foundation UM Rose Scholar. He is a member of the Black Law Students Association, the Criminal Law Society, the International Law Society, and the American Constitution Society.
“We were thrilled to be able to nominate Marcus for this incredible scholarship and we are delighted with his selection,” said Annie Smith, associate professor of law and director of the faculty of public service and pro bono program at the law school. “Our law students and alumni continue to benefit from our partnership with the Squire Patton Boggs Foundation, and we are grateful for the many opportunities it provides.”
Each year, the Squire Patton Boggs Sustainable Impact Scholarship Program awards scholarships to outstanding law students who demonstrate an unwavering commitment to public service and a developed interest in public policy. These law students devote their summers to advancing public policy issues through nonprofit institutions, government agencies, and national or international organizations. The foundation is rooted in a history of civil rights advocacy and has been awarding scholarships since 2004.
About the School of Law: The law school offers a competitive JD as well as an advanced LL.M. curriculum, which are taught by nationally recognized faculty. The school offers unique opportunities for students to participate in pro bono work, internships, live client clinics, competitions, and food and agriculture initiatives. The school strives to identify, discuss and challenge issues of race, color, ethnicity and the impact they have on students, faculty and staff members with the aim to create a diverse, inclusive and equitable community. From the admission of the six pioneers who were the first African-American students to attend law school in the South without a court order, to the governors, judges, prosecutors and graduate professors who became President of the United States and Secretary of State, Law The school has a rich history and culture. Follow us on @uarklaw.
]]>
Losing child tax credit would have ‘devastating impact’
Sophie Collierresearch director at Columbia University Center on Poverty and Social Policyspoke with the new yorker on the implications of cut the child tax credit and what impact it would have on many Low-income American families.
“We found that 3.7 million additional children are living in poverty as a result of the Child Tax Credit reduction between December and January. A very interesting aspect of the CTC program is that it is cash-based. So many social policies and social programs in the United States consist of in-kind transfers (housing subsidies, food stamps) and they are rarely cash. But with that, you’ve seen families get paid in cash, and money is fungible. In one month you might need it to fill a food budget, but for the next month it could be used to fix a car. Another month could help with child care. This flexibility is also evident in the data, with families using it to meet varying needs from month to month.
“I think policy makers know right now that they have a lever in their hands that, if pulled, would lift millions of children out of poverty. I think the pandemic has also revealed overall how point a policy can be effective in stabilizing family income We didn’t see a big increase in the poverty rate in 2020, and I don’t think anyone thought that would be the case in March 2020. Every family has experienced a lot financial hardship, but it also revealed that policies can be effective unless they prevent people from falling into poverty,” she concluded.
Read the full interview here
]]>
Text size
About the authors: Andrew M. Bailey is an Associate Professor of Humanities at Yale-NUS College and a Fellow of the Bitcoin Policy Institute. William J.Luther is an Associate Professor of Economics at Florida Atlantic University and a Fellow of the Bitcoin Policy Institute.
As money flows online, many believe the United States should develop its own central bank digital currency. Allowing individuals to maintain accounts with the Federal Reserve could capture the key benefits touted by cryptocurrency proponents—instant settlement, low fees— without the risks. Countries like China, Sweden and Saudi Arabia are already test CBDCs and others are in development stages. Issuing this form of currency would help the United States stay competitive: a digital dollar for a digital world.
It seems avant-garde, even inevitable. But CBDCs have a major downside. They offer far less financial privacy than cash, and probably less than traditional deposit accounts as well.
Privacy is a necessary feature of a free society. “If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men,” said the French cleric and statesman, Cardinal de Richelieu in the 17th century, “I will find something there that will hang him.” A record of every transaction made by a person would greatly facilitate this task. We recognize the danger of pervasive surveillance, as evidenced by the negative legal connotations of a “fishing expedition” and the doctrine known as the “fruit of the poisonous tree”, which renders inadmissible evidence obtained during an illegal search. Without financial privacy, anyone could be found guilty of breaking the law simply because those in power said so.
Physical silver has a high degree of financial confidentiality. You don’t need to show any ID or open an account to use money. You do not need to connect by phone or the Internet. You can spend your money without permission and without anyone other than your business partner knowing about it. Simply toss it in your fanny pack and pull it out when it’s time to spend.
Cash privacy carriers have limitations, of course. United States does not issue supernotes, large denominations of say $500 or $1,000, making it difficult to use cash in large transactions. Large cash reserves have also led to civil forfeitures of assets: a probably illegal, and a growing practice of governments accepting money without criminal charges. We could imagine a world where cash allows even more privacy, but it already offers some privacy.
Would a CBDC offer this kind of privacy to users? We suspect not.
Despite a lip service to privacy, typical CBDC designs allow central bank oversight of all default transactions, amounts, origins, and destinations. Some supporters hide their autocratic ambitions; others are more transparent. Corn technically possible design a CBDC with privacy guarantees (rather than just assurances), supporters minimize this factemphasizing the need to innovate and act quickly.
This approach does not reconcile confidentiality with the need for regulation. Instead, it risks eliminating privacy altogether. A CBDC is not lacking here simply compared to cash, it would also offer fewer protections than dollar balances held in commercial banks or non-bank financial institutions like PayPal.
The Bank Secrecy Act requires financial institutions to collect identifying information from their customers and provide transaction data to the government when a lawful request is made. However, these private institutions create a firewall between the government and transaction data. It’s far from perfect, offering far less financial privacy than cash. But it is more difficult for the government to illegally access transaction data.
When the The tax authorities summoned Coinbase for its customer data, for example, Coinbase took the case to court, arguing that the request was far too broad. The firewall limited the intrusion, resulting in a stripped down summons.
The Federal Reserve says it can provide the same degree of financial privacy through a CBDC intermediatedwhere individuals do not maintain direct accounts with the Fed, but instead hold Fed liabilities through commercial banks. Since banks – not the Fed – will house customer data, the intermediated CBDC would appear to have the same type of firewall that exists today for bank and non-bank account balances.
But appearances can be deceiving. As long as the payments pass through a central clearinghouse or ledger maintained by the Fed, the Fed would have the ability to monitor those transactions. We doubt commercial banks could successfully challenge such intrusions in court, as the Fed would be monitoring its own record, not a bank’s. The Fed’s confidentiality assurances are therefore only promises and not guarantees.
The standard case of a CBDC is based on the misconception that we need new digital money for our new digital world. Much of our money is already digital; deposits and transfers from commercial banks are recorded on computers and not on paper registers.
What we need is not a new digital moneymany of which already exist, but instead a new digital cash. Digital cash would not simply facilitate electronic transactions; it would also preserve financial confidentiality. Even if they are intermediated, CBDCs are unlikely to do the trick.
Guest comments like this are written by writers outside of Barron’s and MarketWatch newsroom. They reflect the views and opinions of the authors. Submit comment proposals and other feedback to [email protected].
payday ready are generally short-term unsecured loans characterized by high interest rates that generally do not require a credit check.
Although there is no exact and universal definition of the term, the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau indicates that this type of loan is usually $500 or less and is usually due on the borrower’s next payday. States have different laws governing these types of fast loans, but they may be available to Americans through in-store payday lenders or in line, depending on location. The due date on payday loans is generally two to four weeks from the date of issuance, and lenders generally do not consider borrowers’ credit scores or their ability to meet other financial obligations when approving the loan.
To secure a payday loan, payday lenders often require a personal check from the borrower for the loan amount, plus interest and fees, for a future deposit. They often require direct access to the borrower’s bank account.
Payday lenders hold the personal check until the borrower receives their next paycheck, direct deposit or social Security Payment. Depending on the terms of the loan and the laws of the state in question, some payday lenders offer long-term repayment plans that allow them to make multiple electronic withdrawals from the borrower’s bank account.
The average term for payday loans is about two weeks, and loans typically range between $50 and $1,000. In exchange for quick loans that don’t require a credit check, payday borrowers typically pay exorbitant interest rates and fees on their loans. Payday lenders often charge annual percentage ratesor APR, of 400% or more on their loans, plus finance charges of between $10 and $30 for every $100 borrowed.
The only requirements to qualify for most payday loans are an opening Bank account relatively in good standing, a regular income and a source of identification.
Because little consideration is given to the financial status or creditworthiness of borrowers, the CFPB has found that payday loans have a high default rate of around 20%. Additionally, approximately 80% of payday borrowers renew or re-borrow their loans within 30 days of their initial loan.
Qualified state borrowers can apply for a payday loan online from companies such as MoneyMutual, CashUSA.com, and BillsHappen. Many payday lenders also have thousands of physical stores in the United States.
In times of financial emergency or life or death situation, payday loans may be one of the only places Americans have bad credit can turn to temporary financial assistance. However, due to widespread deception and predatory behavior in the payday loan industry, the CFPB, Federal Trade Commission, and other federal and state regulators have repeatedly warned Americans of the dangers of payday lending. payday and imposed restrictions on the activities of payday lenders.
A 2016 five-year study by Pew Charitable Trusts found that 12 million Americans take out payday loans each year, and those borrowers collectively pay $9 billion a year in loan fees alone.
]]>
While the representation of women in academic radiation oncology and medical oncology faculties has increased over time, racial and ethnic minorities are still vastly underrepresented in these fields, according to a cross-sectional study of data from the Association of American Medical Colleges.
“Creating and sustaining a diverse healthcare workforce is a priority to help address societal inequities and health disparities, especially in light of the changing demographics of the general U.S. population. “, wrote authors led by Sophia C. Kamran, MD, a radiation oncologist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
the studywhich was published Dec. 9 in JAMA Oncology, surveyed full-time U.S. faculty in radiation therapy and medical oncology departments from 1970 to 2019.
Improved patient satisfaction, compliance, and outcomes have been documented when a healthcare workforce better reflects the demographics of those they serve, Kamran and associates wrote.
They point to recent increases in the number and urgency of calls for greater diversity in the healthcare workforce, also citing higher incidence and mortality of new cancer cases among Black, Indigenous and Hispanic populations, compared to their non-Hispanic white counterparts. Previous calls for diversity in the health workforce have led to the creation of opportunities and pathways for increased representation of women and racial and ethnic minority groups in medicine, and the overall diversity of medical school faculty has increased by race, ethnicity and gender.
The change, however, is less in magnitude than what has been observed among medical school applicants, students, and graduates, and medical school diversity gains have not kept pace with the growing diversity of medical schools. the American population. It remains unclear whether corresponding advances have taken place in the composition of radiation oncology and medical oncology departments over the past 5 decades.
Analysis by Kamran and associates found that the total number of faculty increased over time in radiation oncology and medical oncology, with faculty representation of underrepresented women in medicine (URM) increasing proportionally from 0, 1% per decade in radiation oncology (95% confidence interval, 0.005%-0.110%; P < . 001 for trend) and medical oncology (95% CI, -0.03% to 0.16%; P = 0.06 for the trend), compared to female non-URM professors, who increased by 0.4% (95% CI, 0.25% to 0.80%) per decade in radiation oncology and by 0 .7% (95% CI, 0.47% to 0.87%) per decade in medical oncology (P < 0.001 for the trend for both). Male faculty representation at URM did not change significantly for radiation oncology (0.03% per decade [95% CI, −0.008% to 0.065%]; P= 0.09 for trend) or for medical oncology (0.003% per decade [95% CI, −0.13% to 0.14%]; P = 0.94 for the trend).
In 2009 and 2019, the representation of women and URM people for both specialties was lower than their representation in the US population. The Faculty of Radiation Oncology had the lowest URM representation in 2019 at 5.1%. The total number of URM faculty represented in both medical oncology and radiation oncology remained low across all grades in 2019 (Medical oncology: instructor, 2 out of 44 [5%]; assistant professor, 18 of 274 [7%]; associate professor, 13 of 177 [7%]; tenured professor, 13 out of 276 [5%]. Radiation oncology: instructor, 9 out of 147 [6%]; assistant professor, 57 out of 927 [6%]; associate professor, 20 out of 510 [4%]; tenured professor, 18 out of 452 [4%]).
“Our results highlight significant diversity differences along the career ladder in both specialties, with women having lower academic rank than men throughout the study period and underrepresented [racial and ethnic groups] at all ranks,” the authors wrote.
And, although blacks, Hispanics and natives make up about 31% of the U.S. population, their inclusion in the health care workforce is lagging at all stages of the pipeline, investigators found.
Diversity among radiation oncologists and medical oncologists lags behind the diversity of medical schools in general, which has grown through the efforts of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
Despite some improvements, the authors suggest the need for more initiatives to retain racial and ethnic minorities in an effort to reflect the diversity of the cancer population in the United States.
“This is a multifactor problem, with a focus not only on increasing diversity in the upstream pipeline, but on maintaining diversity across the pipeline, requiring difficult but necessary conversations about systemic racial and ethnic bias, lack of exposure and opportunity, and financial toxicities and pressures, to name a few. Until these factors are better defined and better addressed, focused and targeted mentoring is essential,” the authors wrote.
In a commentary published with the study, Frederick Lansigan, MD, and Charles R. Thomas Jr, MD, both of Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, called for systemic change in practices hiring.
“Any small step of change that helps support the issues highlighted by Kamran et al.’s study can have a collective positive impact. A holistic assessment of [underrepresented] applicants at all stages of education and training are paramount, and participation in selection committees is necessary to ensure fair processes. Mentoring programs, leadership courses, and addressing microaggressions and abuse can improve retention of [underrepresented] medical school graduates and oncology trainees. Cancer centers can build and lead visible and tangible efforts for diversity, equity, inclusion, justice and belonging as we do at our institution,” the physicians wrote.
Importantly, Lansigan and Thomas said the oncology community must agree that intentionally increasing the number of underrepresented physicians in the U.S. workforce is necessary to better address health care inequities.
“We need everyone on board to reduce structural barriers to early childhood education. We need STEM programs that start in elementary school and provide support through middle school. Oncologists can mentor these young learners to emphasize the positive aspects of a career in oncology, the importance of [underrepresented] oncology physicians and the resilience to care for people with critical illness, many of whom will come from underserved populations. “Physicians and public health experts themselves who want to tackle the gap between [underrepresented] and [non-underrepresented] medicine School [students] and oncology trainees must seek and be elected to positions that can begin to balance this equation. If more are willing to recognize the structural inequalities that exist in the oncology workforce pipeline, we can begin to solve the complex equation of structural inequalities.
Lansigan said he is the acting associate dean of diversity, equity and inclusion at the Geisel School of Medicine and the director of diversity, equity and inclusion for the department of medicine at Dartmouth. -Hitchcock Medical Center. No other disclosures were reported.
This story originally appeared on MDedge.comwhich is part of the Medscape professional network.
]]>